Post by account_disabled on Nov 26, 2023 3:38:01 GMT -5
In particular in the provision of Art. . In the light of the regulations resulting from the Labor Code, in order to recognize a disease as an occupational disease, the joint occurrence of two conditions is necessary, i.e. stating that it is a disease included in the list of occupational diseases and occurrence of occupational exposure within the meaning of this provision. The list of occupational diseases is included in the annex to the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of June , on occupational diseases. As a rule, it is unacceptable to diagnose an occupational disease outside this list.
As rightly pointed out by the Supreme Court, when determining an occupational disease, only the implementing acts issued under the authority of the provisions of the Labor Code may be taken into account, and the list of occupational diseases photo editing servies photo editing servies cannot be expanded by inference from other generally applicable legal provisions judgment of the Supreme Court of April , , file I PK . In turn, when it comes to diagnosing the occurrence of an occupational disease, in accordance with the provisions of Art.
Of the Labor Code An occupational disease may be diagnosed in an employee or former employee during the period of his or her employment in occupational exposure or after termination of work in such exposure, provided that documented symptoms of the disease occur within the period specified in the list of occupational diseases. The above provision does not provide for forms of documenting disease symptoms. However, following court decisions, in particular the judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Gliwice of May , , act IV SAGl it is not possible to confirm an occupational disease in a former employee whose symptoms of a disease.
As rightly pointed out by the Supreme Court, when determining an occupational disease, only the implementing acts issued under the authority of the provisions of the Labor Code may be taken into account, and the list of occupational diseases photo editing servies photo editing servies cannot be expanded by inference from other generally applicable legal provisions judgment of the Supreme Court of April , , file I PK . In turn, when it comes to diagnosing the occurrence of an occupational disease, in accordance with the provisions of Art.
Of the Labor Code An occupational disease may be diagnosed in an employee or former employee during the period of his or her employment in occupational exposure or after termination of work in such exposure, provided that documented symptoms of the disease occur within the period specified in the list of occupational diseases. The above provision does not provide for forms of documenting disease symptoms. However, following court decisions, in particular the judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Gliwice of May , , act IV SAGl it is not possible to confirm an occupational disease in a former employee whose symptoms of a disease.