Post by nurnobi85 on Feb 12, 2024 3:06:54 GMT -5
Prescribed in articles 2 and 3 of the Consolidation of Labor Laws (CLT, articles 769 and 818 ; CPC, article 333, II). Identical procedural treatment must be given to the second defendant (company that received the labor). In order to corroborate its assertions, the first defendant brought to the file the documentary evidence of pages 34/186, summarized in the Minutes of the Assembly of its foundation (pages 34/39); in the Minutes of the Ordinary General Assembly of March 27, 2004 (pages 40/49); in your National Register of Legal Entities (page 51); in its Bylaws (pages 53/75); in the Service Provision Agreement signed with the second.
Defendant The following documents also came into the file: 1- Registration Form – Term of Adhesion signed by the complainant; 2- List of Workers and payments made; 3- File Sending Protocol; 4- Minutes of the General Assembly of the Cooperative; 5- Bylaws of the Cooperative; – Minutes Dubai Email List of Constitution of the Cooperative and Identification of the Board of Directors fl; Cooperative Members’ Remuneration Sheets and proof of payments made to the complainant; List of Workers Registered with INSS and GPS When issuing a statement about the defense and documents that accompanied it, the author reaffirmed her initial thesis, emphasizing that she was never a member of the.
Cooperative also because the first defendant is not a real cooperative, but an irregular labor supply company. It is indisputable that the debate, in the specific case of the case, is focused on the existence or not of legal subordination in the relationship that was maintained between the parties, capable of configuring the employment relationship or removing it, if the requirement in question is not present. . And this is so because the other assumptions that give the worker the status of employee (CLT, article, 3rd), namely, personality in the provision of work (all work involved the personal provision of services by the claimant.
Defendant The following documents also came into the file: 1- Registration Form – Term of Adhesion signed by the complainant; 2- List of Workers and payments made; 3- File Sending Protocol; 4- Minutes of the General Assembly of the Cooperative; 5- Bylaws of the Cooperative; – Minutes Dubai Email List of Constitution of the Cooperative and Identification of the Board of Directors fl; Cooperative Members’ Remuneration Sheets and proof of payments made to the complainant; List of Workers Registered with INSS and GPS When issuing a statement about the defense and documents that accompanied it, the author reaffirmed her initial thesis, emphasizing that she was never a member of the.
Cooperative also because the first defendant is not a real cooperative, but an irregular labor supply company. It is indisputable that the debate, in the specific case of the case, is focused on the existence or not of legal subordination in the relationship that was maintained between the parties, capable of configuring the employment relationship or removing it, if the requirement in question is not present. . And this is so because the other assumptions that give the worker the status of employee (CLT, article, 3rd), namely, personality in the provision of work (all work involved the personal provision of services by the claimant.